Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Control | qqqwwweee | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Dimir Control | crystalpalacefc | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Dimir Demons | trevor dalrymple | 4-1 | None |
Dimir Control | jps_17 | 4-3 | None |
Dimir Control | afitzsimmons | 3-3 | None |
Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Midrange , Dimir Mill , Dimir Proxy , Dimir Reanimator , Dimir Reenact , Dimir Tempo , Esper Midrange
Doomsday Excruciator ranks #314 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 93%).
Black average: 60.1%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Doomsday Excruciator is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 7.50 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 6 mana, the average win rate in the format is 70.4%. Doomsday Excruciator has a win rate of 75.0%, making it 6.6% better than other 6-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 6 | 67.7% | 2 |
Disfigure | Instant | 13 | 67.0% | 1 |
Chrome Host Seedshark | Creature — Phyrexian Shark | 20 | 66.4% | 5 |
Soul-Guide Lantern | Artifact | 7 | 65.7% | 3 |
Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 41 | 64.1% | 13 |
Blot Out | Instant | 48 | 60.8% | 10 |
Quick Study | Instant | 23 | 60.4% | 6 |
Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 76 | 59.1% | 16 |
Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 70 | 59.0% | 14 |
Malicious Eclipse | Sorcery | 105 | 59.0% | 30 |
Cards that perform better with Doomsday Excruciator than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jace, the Perfected Mind | Legendary Planeswalker — Jace | 4 | 5 | 75.0% | 70.5% | +4.5% |
Malicious Eclipse | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 75.0% | 71.3% | +3.7% |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 5 | 75.0% | 71.7% | +3.3% |
Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 75.0% | 71.9% | +3.1% |
Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 5 | 75.0% | 72.1% | +2.9% |
Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 5 | 75.0% | 72.2% | +2.8% |
Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 5 | 75.0% | 72.5% | +2.5% |
Negate | Instant | 2 | 5 | 71.7% | 73.3% | -1.6% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Demons | 86 | 84.3% | 50.2% |
Dimir Control | 61 | 83.6% | 53.7% |
Dimir Midrange | 7 | 0.3% | 20.8% |
Unknown Archetype | 7 | 2.2% | 53.9% |
Dimir Bounce | 5 | 1.0% | 73.1% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.